The evidence base for intracameral injection includes the large series listed above in slide 1. Most of the studies compared a topical antibiotic group with intracameral injection plus topical antibiotic.
Slide 2 shows the low endophthalmitis rates reported with intracameral antibiotic injection.
Increasingly, studies are being published examining infection rates with intracameral injection alone, without an additional topical antibiotic (slide 3). Recent meta-analyses and review studies (boxed studies in slide 3) conclude that there is no benefit to adding topical antibiotic drops to intracameral injection.
Published studies to date do not indicate superiority between the most commonly injected antibiotics, cefuroxime and moxifloxacin.
Inject 0.1 mL of moxifloxacin 0.5% (topical Vigamox bottle strength)
Do not use this strength for stromal hydration.
or
Inject 0.5 mL of moxifloxacin 0.1% (diluted)
Stromal hydration has been safely used at this concentration.
Both injection strategies deliver about 500 µg moxifloxacin. The final concentration of drug in the eye with Method 1 (and thus, bactericidal activity) will depend on the patient's postop anterior chamber volume, whereas with Method 2, by replacing nearly all of the aqueous with diluted moxifloxacin, a more consistent drug concentration is more likely achieved following injection.
There is no FDA approved intracameral agent in the US. Moxifloxacin must be compounded.
Explore subconjunctival triamcinolone injection as the 2nd component of a dropfree regimen.